Written by: Christian O’Dwyer, CFA | Vice President
Investors should always be wary of promises of risk-free returns from their advisors and the products they recommend or sell. All investments carry a degree of risk, except for those rare cases of pure arbitrage. Successful long-term investors find opportunities where risk is garnered only when it is accompanied by a commensurate return. Structured products, which are typically designed and issued by financial institutions and sold by broker-dealers to individual investors, are a good example of strategies that frequently promise upside market participation alongside capital preservation. This article reviews the definition of structured products, how they work, how to analyze them, and their role in a diversified portfolio.
What Are Structured Products?
Typically, structured products are debt securities with a fixed maturity and include two components: a bond component and a derivative component. The bond portion of the note is the majority of the investment and provides principal protection. The embedded derivative may be linked to the performance of an asset, index, a single equity security, a basket of equity securities, interest rates, commodities, and/or foreign currencies. The notes are used to modify market exposure, or otherwise manage market risk, credit risk, or both. The type of derivative embedded in the note will affect the performance characteristics of the note and the complexity of performance calculations. The products typically employ a degree of leverage.
How do Structured Products Work?
The below image provides an example of a theoretical structured note. Consider a simple, three-year, S&P 500 index-linked structured note with 100% principal protection promising preservation of capital, 80% participation with the index and a capped return of 20%. The various return scenarios are depicted:
How to Analyze Them?
While our example was (hopefully) useful from a conceptual standpoint, it was very basic as compared to most structured products in the market. As features are added to the products, complexities mount making appropriate levels of due diligence more difficult. In response, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued a 2015 bulletin that plainly stated, “While structured notes may enable individual retail investors to participate in investment strategies that are not typically offered to them, these products can be very complex and have significant investment risks. Before investing in structured notes, you should understand how the notes work and carefully consider their risks.” Additional considerations are listed below.
Know the fees and other costs associated with the investment.
Structured notes are highly complex and carry low fee transparency; it is important to fully understand both the stated and embedded costs associated with the product.
Know whether the product is appropriate for the intended investment objective.
Are the risks associated with a particular structured note within your tolerance for risk, or are your investment needs better served by investing in another product?
What other investment choices are available to me? Are other products available that provide investment exposure to similar assets, indices or strategies? If so, how do the costs of these other products compare to those associated with the structured note?
Carefully consider what might be a suitable investment for you, and whether there are better alternatives to the structured note you are considering. For example, can I purchase some or all of the components of the structured note separately for a better price?
How long will my money be tied up?
Many structured notes are meant to be held to maturity. If you need your money back prior to maturity, you could lose a significant portion of your investment.
Are potential returns limited?
Some structured notes have caps on the returns that can be earned based on the performance of the reference asset or index. This is an example of a potentially significant embedded cost.
What is the credit risk of the issuer of the structured note?
Remember that any payoff on a structured note is subject to the creditworthiness of the issuer. Be sure to understand the financial condition of the issuer and read its disclosures as carefully as you would for any other investment.
For more information, please visit: https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-bulletins/ib_structurednotes.html
What is the Role of Structured Products in a Diversified Portfolio?
While the capital preservation feature and the customization of structured products can make them attractive for potential investors, the complicated payoff profile, opaque expense structure, lack of liquidity, and associated credit risk decrease their usefulness within a broad portfolio context. Investors should also consider opportunity costs associated with forgone investments in their overall strategy. In sum, the time-tested qualities of remaining patient, keeping costs low and being well diversified are most likely to drive long-term investment success.
For more than 20 years, Innovest has provided excellent client service as well as forward-looking, innovative investment solutions for endowments and foundations, retirement plans, and families. We are an independent provider of investment-related consulting services and work on a fee-only basis.
Tell someone that everything will be great and they’re likely to either shrug you off or offer a skeptical eye. Tell someone they’re in danger and you have their undivided attention. Click here to learn why pessimism is intellectually seductive.
Source: Collaborative Fund
By staying attentive to your loved ones as they age, you can help them to spot potential scams, minimize financial losses, and focus on what really matters: a happy and fulfilling life in retirement.
Source: Charles Schwab
Should retirees be concerned that Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) lead to the premature depletion of their assets? Click here for “Your RMD Amounts Are More Conservative Than You Might Think” by Christine Benz, Morningstar’s director of personal finance.
“As leaders, we must watch for the shifts in people we lead. If not, we may miss an opportunity to see the rainbow inside of them. We may live our lives leading people we don’t know and have very little positive impact.” Please click here to continue reading.
Source: Customer Fanatix
“Graham Smith is still in his twenties. He majored in business at Wheaton, an evangelical Christian liberal arts college in Illinois, where he was influenced by a professor who repeatedly warned of embracing “golden handcuffs” that can trap workers in well-paying yet unfulfilling jobs. When British theologian N. T. Wright came to campus, Smith walked away from the talk with a haunting question: How can you do things in the world that cause others to “write a cheerful question mark” over your life? “ To keep reading click here.
Source: Philanthropy Roundtable
“Did you know that 75 percent of executives say mentoring has been critical to their career development? According to a recent survey from the American Society for Training and Development, these relationships are invaluable in helping to make important professional decisions.”
We absolutely believe in mentors for all of our employees at Innovest, and we are excited to share this article from ColoradoBiz with you. Click here to read more.
“Whether it’s a high school booster club with a $500 budget or United Way Worldwide with its $3.9 billion budget, most nonprofits must have investments from individuals and businesses to achieve its mission. Nonprofits who intentionally and strategically recruit board members that can raise money have an advantage over nonprofits that recruit only for industry expertise, policy or community/industry representation.” Click here to learn more.
“The U.S. has no comprehensive national law governing cybersecurity and no uniform framework for measuring the effectiveness of protections, though retirement plan recordkeepers maintain the personally identifiable information on millions of workers, collecting names, birth dates, social security numbers, and beneficiaries”. Click here to learn more.
Source: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
“The ability of the Treasury yield curve to predict future recessions has recently received a great deal of public attention. An inversion of the yield curve—when short-term interest rates are higher than long-term rates—has been a reliable predictor of recessions”. Click here to keep reading
Source: FRBSF Economic Letter
If you fell asleep in 1945 and woke up in 2018 you would not recognize the world around you. The amount of growth that took place during that period is virtually unprecedented. If you learned that there have been no nuclear attacks since 1945, you’d be shocked. If you saw the level of wealth in New York and San Francisco, you’d be shocked. If you compared it to the poverty of Detroit, you’d be shocked. If you saw the price of homes, college tuition, and health care, you’d be shocked. Our politics would blow your mind. And if you tried to think of a reasonable narrative of how it all happened, my guess is you’d be totally wrong. Because it isn’t intuitive, and it wasn’t foreseeable 73 years ago. Here’s how this all happened.
Click here to read the article.
Source: The Collaborative Fund
“Security freezes, often called credit freezes, are “absolutely” the best way to prevent criminals from using your personal information to open new accounts in your name, said Paul Stephens, director of policy and advocacy with Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, a consumer advocacy nonprofit group.” Click here to learn more.
Source: New York Times
“The Labor Department has signaled it will address by next fall unfinished business surrounding its investment-advice rule that was killed by a federal court earlier this year.” Click here to learn more.
Source: Investment News
“The Securities and Exchange Commission is proposing rule changes to the disclosure regime for variable annuity and variable life insurance contracts in an effort to help investors with their investment decisions.” Click here to learn more.
According to a bit of “common wisdom,” U.S. stocks have performed better under divided government, when at least one legislative body—the Senate or the House—is controlled by the party opposite the president’s. Click here to read more in VP Chris Meyer’s article, “Mixing Politics and Money - A Sure Thing?”
“A bill introduced in the Senate in July would create a new type of “open” multiple employer plan (MEP), an employee benefit plan that can be maintained as a single plan in which two or more unrelated employers participate.” This sounds like a good development, but there are considerable fiduciary issues. Click here to learn more.
“…the district court’s ruling mid-trial dismissing plaintiffs’ claims that Putnam acted imprudently in selecting the Plan’s investment options and that it breached the duty of loyalty by engaging in self-dealing,”. Click here to learn more.